![]() ![]() If there could be a genuine integration of manual, controllable brush (with other attributes I noted in my wishlist in the Product Roadmap thread) & further refinement, for accuracy, of the nascent AI (Smart Fill) Brush, that would be a best of both worlds & probably a highly competitive product offering.Photo AI forgoes the complexity found in most photo editing apps, instead aiming to do the grunt work for you. Unfortunately, the current tool is doing anything but that (per my description of what I’ve observed above) To me, the needed, efficient smartness I would value is a Smart Brush that I could use as a choice or on demand to fill a mask accurately to edges my hands might not be able to paint - ie, to provide a very accurate Edge Aware functionality selectively & only where desired. That said, I’m not opposed to using a Smart Brush if the brush behaves smartly & saves me time in achieving my vision. I, personally, don’t like the concept of relinquishing creatvity to a (as I like to call it) ‘robot’ (a computing engine that ppl attempt to train but it uses math to interpret that). Especially if PAI is intended as a preprocessor which was my sense it is supposed to be, given its functions. A lot of photographs do not possess that. Unless, there are distinct tonal boundaries between said subject/object(s) & their surroundings. There is just no current way to accurately mask a subject or object with the AI Brush.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |